logo Decode Hollywood
Press the Enter key to search or the ESC key to close.

Key players

#LouTaylor #BlairBerk #SamLutfi #AndrewWallet #KennyMeiselas #MelissaNathan #JenniferAbel #Horwitz #CAA #WME

Stars

#PDiddy #BlakeLively #BritneySpears #JohnnyDepp #JustinBaldoni #MichealJackson #AmberHeard #Weinstein

Subjects

#lawsuits #businessmanagement #talentmanager #scriptwriting #NFT #agencies #PR

The Macron-Owens War Goes Nuclear: Assassination Claims, Transphobia, and a Transatlantic Legal Battle

23 November 2025
The Macron-Owens War Goes Nuclear: Assassination Claims, Transphobia, and a Transatlantic Legal Battle

It began as a bizarre, internet-poisoned conspiracy theory festering on the fringes of the French far-right. It migrated across the Atlantic, weaponized by one of America's most provocative conservative commentators. Now, it has transmogrified into an international incident involving a sitting head of state, a high-stakes defamation lawsuit in Delaware, and, most recently, bombshell allegations of state-sponsored murder.

The conflict between Candace Owens and French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, has breached the containment field of standard political discourse. On Saturday, November 22, Owens detonated a rhetorical dirty bomb, publicly alleging that the French government is actively plotting her assassination.

This claim marks a thermonuclear escalation in a months-long feud that has seen the French First Couple take the unprecedented step of filing suit in American courts to stop Owens from spreading the debunked rumor that Brigitte Macron was born a male.

What is driving this collision between a European power couple and an American MAGA influencer? Is Owens' latest claim a genuine cry for help based on intelligence, or a strategic distraction designed to reframe a losing legal battle into a narrative of political martyrdom?

To understand this moment, we must peel back the layers of a saga involving 4Chan-style conspiracy theories, international law, and the lucrative business of outrage.

Part I: The "Urgent" Warning

On November 22, 2025, the tenuous guardrails surrounding the Macron-Owens feud completely collapsed.

Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Owens issued a lengthy, alarming statement claiming she had received "very serious" and "urgent" intelligence from a "high-level source inside the French government."

The allegation was stark: Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron want her dead.

Owens claimed her source—whose identity and government credentials she insisted she verified—warned her that a "small team" within the French National Gendarmerie Intervention Group (GIGN), an elite tactical unit, had been tasked with the plot, allegedly with the involvement of an Israeli operative.

She stated the target list wasn't limited to her. It also included Xavier Poussard, a French journalist widely credited (or blamed) with helping popularize the initial conspiracy theory against Brigitte Macron in France.

In a move designed to maximize emotional resonance with her audience, Owens linked this alleged threat to the recent, tragic death of conservative figure Charlie Kirk in September 2025. Owens implies a dark pattern, suggesting her friend was silenced by similar nefarious forces, claiming connections between his killer and French military training.

By framing herself as the next target in a globalist hit list, Owens instantly shifted the narrative frame. She was no longer just a defendant in a defamation suit; she was positioning herself as a political dissident facing execution by a Western democracy.

Part II: The Casus Belli — The Delaware Lawsuit

To understand the assassination claim, one must understand the legal vice grip tightening around Owens. This entire spectacle is rooted in a lawsuit filed in July 2025.

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron took the extraordinarily rare step of retaining American counsel—the heavyweight defamation firm Clare Locke, known for winning the massive Dominion vs. Fox News case—and suing Candace Owens in Delaware Superior Court.

The lawsuit targets Owens' eight-part podcast series, "Becoming Brigitte," and numerous social media posts where she amplified the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a transgender woman named Jean-Michel Trogneux who stole a woman's identity.

The Macrons’ 219-page legal complaint is blistering. It accuses Owens of engaging in a "campaign of global humiliation" and spreading "verifiably false and devastating lies" aimed at destroying the lives of the French First Family for the sake of clicks, subscriptions, and personal brand building.

The filing details how the Macrons' legal team sent multiple retraction demands, providing evidence—including vintage photos and genealogical data—disproving the theory. Owens not only ignored these demands but mocked them, using the legal threats as content to further monetize the controversy.

The Macrons are suing for defamation and false light, seeking unspecified damages. But more than money, the lawsuit is a desperate attempt by a sitting head of state to use the American legal system to vaporize a lie that has circled the globe.

Part III: Anatomy of a Lie — The "Jean-Michel Trogneux" Theory

Candace Owens did not invent the lie that Brigitte Macron is a man. She just bought the biggest megaphone for it.

The conspiracy theory originated in the fever swamps of the French internet around 2021, pushed by figures like the aforementioned Xavier Poussard and two women, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, who claimed the First Lady was actually her own deceased brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux.

The theory is a classic example of "transvestigation"—a growing trend in far-right conspiratorial circles where prominent figures, particularly powerful women, are "investigated" by internet sleuths convinced they are secretly transgender. Victims of this bizarre scrutiny include Michelle Obama, Jacinda Ardern, and Marguerite Macron.

It is a theory born of misogyny and transphobia, designed to "other" powerful women, suggesting their influence is unnatural and deceptive.

In France, this theory was dealt with legally. Brigitte Macron and her brother Jean-Michel (who is very much alive) sued Rey and Roy. In September 2024, a Paris court found the women guilty of defamation. Although an appeals court later overturned the specific conviction on technical grounds regarding the nature of the lawsuit, it did not validate the claims as true.

Despite the French legal system debunking the claims, Owens imported the theory to her massive American audience in early 2024, staking her "entire professional reputation" on its veracity and calling Brigitte a "goofy man."

Part IV: The Strategy of Escalation

Why would Candace Owens abruptly claim the President of France is trying to kill her? Legal and political analysts suggest several strategic motivations beyond genuine belief in the threat.

1. The Martyr Complex and Base Mobilization Owens' brand thrives on conflict and victimhood. By claiming there is a literal hit out on her life, she galvanizes her base of support. It turns a complex legal battle about defamation law into a simple, visceral story of good versus evil. It makes it difficult for her supporters to question the veracity of her original claims about Brigitte Macron because doing so would seem like siding with her would-be assassins.

2. Muddying the Legal Waters The defamation lawsuit against Owens is strong. Truth is the ultimate defense in libel cases, and the claim that Brigitte Macron is a man is demonstrably false. By introducing monumental allegations of state-sponsored murder, Owens creates chaos surrounding the legal proceedings. While it won't dismiss the defamation case, it creates a media circus that could distract from the core facts of the libel suit.

3. The Grift of Persecution Owens has previously admitted that the legal threats from the Macrons inspired her to produce more content on the topic, which was "aggressively monetized." An assassination plot is the ultimate engagement driver. It generates clicks, views, and potentially donations from supporters convinced she is on the front lines of a war against global tyranny.

Part V: The Global Fallout

This feud is having real-world consequences beyond the internet. The international community is beginning to view Owens not just as a commentator, but as a source of instability.

In October 2025, Australia took the drastic step of denying Candace Owens a visa. The Australian government cited her history of extremist commentary and the potential for her presence to incite public discord. The decision was upheld by Australia's High Court, signaling that foreign governments are increasingly unwilling to host her brand of inflammatory rhetoric.

Furthermore, the sight of a G7 leader—President Macron—having to utilize American courts to stop the spread of disinformation about his wife highlights the impotence of traditional diplomacy in the face of algorithmic conspiracy theories.

As of this writing, the Élysée Palace has not officially responded to the assassination claims. They are likely relying on their high-powered American lawyers to address Owens in the only venue that matters now: the Delaware Superior Court.

The Macrons are prepared to offer "scientific proof" in court that Brigitte is biologically female. It will be a surreal spectacle—a First Lady forced to prove her sex to refute an internet troll.

Owens has escalated this conflict from a battle over truth to a battle for survival. Whether her claims of an assassination plot are real intelligence or cynical theater, one thing is certain: Candace Owens will not go quietly.

Sources

crossmenuchevron-right